Feb 202018

An anti-gun Florida school shooter witness, David Hogg (whose Trump-hating dad works for the FBI), rehearses his spoon-fed lines

Anti-Gun School Shooter Witness Rehearses Spoonfed Lines

This is the same kid who repeated the lie that “there were 17 mass shootings so far this year” and Chris Wallace let him get away with it. Sickening. This is what the Deep State has resorted to, using highschool kids as pawns? I guess college students weren’t effective enough. Yes, his father is retired FBI.

Something fishy is going on.

David Hogg was also be interviewed as a ‘Witness’, on another side of the US, only months ago.

Cut to about 0:28

School shooting survivors demand action on gun control

Same kid on CNN. Was this scripted? Pay attention to the body language. Are these two lying or acting?



Feb 192018

When the entire web is finally brought into the light, there is NO doubt we will see clearly the spider sitting in the middle of it all…

The Spider In The Center Of The Web

Lerner, Lynch, Holder, Rosenstein, Yates, Page, Comey, McCabe, Ohr, Strzok, Clinton, Rice, and the list goes on and on. Each an individual strand of corruption alone, but together a web that encompasses the entire Administrative Branch under Obama.

Each time a little more of the darkness is discovered we see more and more how the strands intersect and connect, creating a web of corruption like none before seen in the Administrative Branch of the United States.

The LEFT frantically attempts to downplay any strand; trying desperately to divert the public’s attention… Their TRUE fear is that the entire web will see the light of day and there will no longer be any way to hide the spider sitting in the middle.

That will be the day that Washington’s Governing Elite and its scheme for domination and control will end.





Feb 182018

This is an absolute BOMBSHELL and needs more coverage: VP of Facebook Ads, Rob Goldman says majority of Russian ads were AFTER THE ELECTION and calls out the Mainstream Media for not covering it.

VP Of Facebook Ads, Rob Goldman, Says Russian Ads Were AFTER THE ELECTION

Facebook vice president of advertising Rob Goldman slammed the media, on Twitter, for their misleading coverage of Russia’s meddling in American politics.

“Very excited to see the Mueller indictment today. We shared Russian ads with Congress, Mueller and the American people to help the public understand how the Russians abused our system. Still, there are keys facts about the Russian actions that are still not well understood”

“Most of the coverage of Russian meddling involves their attempt to effect the outcome of the 2016 US election. I have seen all of the Russian ads and I can say very definitively that swaying the election was *NOT* the main goal”

The majority of the Russian ad spend happened AFTER the election. We shared that fact, but very few outlets have covered it because it doesn’t align with the main media narrative of Trump and the election”

Retweeted by President Trump no less:



h/t u/malioswa



Feb 172018
The $1.2 Billion Campaign

Two years of innuendo and investigation in order to indict thirteen Russians for buying Facebooks ads that almost nobody saw and which made no difference in the election.

Utter bullshit and a cover up! So yet again we see that is the Democrats, Mainstream Media and the Deep State cabal that is doing Russia’s bidding.




Feb 092018

The National Enquirer is more accurate than Mainstream Media. Sad.

The National Enquirer - Obama And Hillary Ordered FBI To Spy On Trump

The world we live in… The National Enquirer is real news and the The New York Times is the tabloid?

Obama & Hillary Ordered FBI To Spy On Trump
Illegal wiretaps and secret papers are ‘worse than Watergate!’




Feb 072018

Obama implicated! Obama knew everything!

New Texts Expose Obama Involvement In Clinton Email Investigation

Newly disclosed texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were exchanged on September 2, 2016. In the text exchange, Page writes to Strzok about preparing talking points for FBI Director James Comey because, “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” This text raises questions about Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.

We all thought Obama was not supposed to be involved at all in the Clinton email investigation.

Obama was complicit in this!


From Fox News:

Newly revealed text messages between FBI paramours Peter Strzok and Lisa Page include an exchange about preparing talking points for then-FBI Director James Comey to give to President Obama, who wanted “to know everything we’re doing.”

The message, from Page to Strzok, was among thousands of texts between the lovers reviewed by Fox News. The pair both worked at one point for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Page wrote to Strzok on Sept. 2, 2016 about prepping Comey because, “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” Senate investigators told Fox News this text raises questions about President Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.


What happened on September 2, 2016?

Why nothing, other than the FBI publishing documents relating to its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email while serving as Secretary of State.

If there’s anything to take away from this, it’s that Peter Strzok is an incredibly stupid person. You would have to be a complete idiot to discuss a criminal conspiracy involving top people in the Democrat Party and the intelligence agencies to overthrow the people’s democratically elected government on a personal phone, but to do it on a government phone? Strzok and Page’s stupidity are going to take them all down.





Feb 062018

The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence issues the “FISA MEMO: CHARGE AND RESPONSE” document to answer the major Mainstream Media and Democrat attacks on it.

FISA Memo Charge And Response

The response to all charges against the memo, further cementing its validity and destroying all of the Left’s arguments.

A clear and powerful rebuttal to the attacks!

This needs to be shared far and wide.

CHARGE: The Majority failed to comply with House and Committee Rules.
RESPONSE: All House and Committee rules were complied with and followed, as prescribed, from the requirement to notice a business meeting, to make available classified executive session material to the House, and to publically disclose the material. i

CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine the Special Counsel’s ongoing Russia investigation.
RESPONSE: The memo has nothing to do with the Special Counsel’s investigation, and is intended to expose past abuses of the FISA process, namely Senior DOJ and FBI officials’ use of unverified opposition research. That research was financed by a presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, and resulted in a surveillance warrant on an American citizen. Further, consistent with its bipartisan commitment not to impede any ongoing investigation, the Committee has not sought documents or information post-dating the appointment of the Special Counsel in May 2017.

CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine DOJ and FBI.
RESPONSE: The memo is intended to hold some senior DOJ and FBI officials accountable for abuses of the FISA process, consistent with the Committee’s constitutional responsibilities. The Committee has not only the right, but the responsibility, to conduct rigorous oversight of potential abuses—including by making information publicly available— on behalf of the American people.

CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine the men and women of DOJ and FBI.
RESPONSE: The memo is focused on abuses by a small number of senior leaders. The Committee’s fulfillment of its constitutional duty supports the hard working men and women of law enforcement and the intelligence community by enabling effective, efficient and constitutional oversight of their agencies.

CHARGE: The memo unfairly targets government officials like Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
RESPONSE: This is patently false. The memo simply states that Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and former FBI Deputy Director McCabe were among the senior DOJ and FBI officials who signed off on a FISA application that included, as a substantial and essential part, the DNC and Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier.

CHARGE: The memo undermines recently-reauthorized FISA Section 702.
RESPONSE: The memo has nothing to do with Section 702, which targets foreigners located overseas. As specified in the memo, the FISA order authorizing surveillance on Carter Page was not obtained under Title VII.

CHARGE: DOJ and FBI did nothing wrong by using the Steele dossier in a FISA application.
RESPONSE: DOJ and FBI senior leaders had four separate opportunities, but failed each time, to adequately investigate or disclose to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) the role of the DNC and Clinton campaign as the funders and beneficiaries of the Steele dossier—even though its political origins were known to numerous senior DOJ and FBI officials. Additionally, FBI’s reliance on Steele’s past credibility was misplaced, since he concealed from the FBI unauthorized media contacts with numerous outlets and his anti-Trump bias, which was known by a senior DOJ official.

CHARGE: The memo, and DOJ and FBI’s use of the Steele dossier in a FISA application, are no big deal.
RESPONSE: It is important for the American people to judge the facts presented in the memo, which Members of the Committee and House assessed to be of substantial public interest. But it is simply astonishing that Democrats would argue the memo is insignificant given the extreme lengths they went to prevent its release.

CHARGE: The memo is nothing more than a collection of partisan talking points.
RESPONSE: The memo is the result of a nearly year long investigative effort by the Committee, including document review and witness interviews. As the public can see, it sets forth a series of facts uncovered by Committee investigators in the face of attempts efforts by senior DOJ and FBI officials to stonewall the Committee’s, and contains no partisan rhetoric or personal attacks.

CHARGE: The memo represents an irresponsible release of highly-sensitive classified information.
RESPONSE: The complaints from the left about Congress doing its job, and Democrats’ sudden opposition to transparency, represent a hypocritical and partisan attempt to prevent the public from learning about the memo’s contents. Contrary to unauthorized leaks of classified information so prevalent in Washington today, the memo’s release occurred pursuant to the Committee’s oversight function and a process laid out in House Rules that balances the public and national interests. Some have falsely claimed that the memo contains “an immense amount of classified information.” However, it was specifically crafted to exclude information that might damage national security and has now been declassified following an executive branch review. This authorized, limited release of formerly classified information serves the public interest, and the only “source or method” specifically mentioned is Christopher Steele—who was terminated as an FBI source for unauthorized disclosures to the press.

CHARGE: It is irresponsible to release the memo over DOJ and FBI’s objections.
RESPONSE: It is disappointing that senior officials at DOJ and FBI would continue to attempt to obstruct the Committee’s efforts to share with the American people information related to surveillance abuses at these agencies. The Committee notes that both DOJ and FBI—along with other stakeholders—had an opportunity to provide input into the executive branch review process, which resulted in the President’s decision to declassify the document in full.

CHARGE: DOJ and FBI had good reason to suspect Carter Page of being a Russian agent.
RESPONSE: While many unverified claims have been made by both Christopher Steele and Committee Democrats, the focus of the memo is not Carter Page. The focus of the memo is the Steele dossier—funded by the DNC and Clinton campaign, and described as “salacious and unverified” by former FBI Director Comey—that formed a substantial and essential part of a secret court application for a warrant on an American citizen.

CHARGE: According to FBI, there are “material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”
RESPONSE: No one, including the FBI officials who reviewed the memo, has identified any factual errors, and the Committee encourages DOJ and FBI to make publicly available, to the greatest extent possible, documents in those agencies’ possession that would shed additional light on the abuses uncovered by the Committee. Also, the memo does not purport to be exhaustive: it is focused on DOJ and FBI’s use of the DNC- and Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier to obtain a warrant on an American citizen.

CHARGE: Most members have not reviewed the documents underlying the memo.
RESPONSE: As part of stonewalling the Committee’s investigation, senior officials at DOJ and FBI initially placed burdensome and unreasonable restrictions on the Committee’s access to documents responsive to its subpoenas. Chairman Nunes designated Chairman Gowdy, an experienced prosecutor and investigator, to lead the Committee’s review. All Republican members participated in weekly briefings on the results of the Committee’s investigative efforts, and the Committee does not believe there are—or should be—current restrictions on the Committee’s access to this important information.

CHARGE: The memo’s release violated an agreement with DOJ.
RESPONSE: DOJ and FBI placed no limits on disseminating the information made available to the Committee which—contrary to false claims—is not highly classified or limited to the so-called “Gang of 8.”

CHARGE: The Committee drafted the memo in coordination with the White House.
RESPONSE: This is patently false. No one outside the Committee played any role in drafting or compiling the memo. The Committee had no communications with the White House about the contents of the memo until after the Committee voted to make it publicly available, and it was transmitted to the President’s representatives in accordance with House rules.

CHARGE: The memo was materially altered after the Committee’s vote to make it public.
RESPONSE: The Committee’s vote to release the memo was procedurally sound, and in accordance with House and Committee Rules. The version transmitted to the White House included minor edits, made before the Committee voted to make the memo public, to the version previously made available to all members of the House. The minor edits included technical and grammatical changes, along with the deletion of one piece of information in response to FBI’s last-minute suggestion—which was in accordance with national security protocols, but had no bearing on the memo’s substance. The memo also includes a more precise characterization of the FISA application’s use of a Yahoo News article, in response to feedback from Committee Democrats. Complaints about these edits from Committee Democrats—none of whom voted to release any version of the memo—represent the latest example of the minority’s consistent efforts to obstruct the Committee’s efforts to collect and share information about FISA abuses. The minority opposed all efforts to obtain the underlying documents, including issuing subpoenas for them in August 2017.

CHARGE: The Committee blocked release of the Democrats’ memo.
RESPONSE: The Committee elected to follow the same process and timing for the Majority and Minority memos by first making each available for all members of the House to review. The Majority voted unanimously to make the Minority’s memo available to all House members, even though all Democrats voted against making the Majority’s memo similarly available. The Committee is planning a business meeting next week to address the Minority’s memo, and is soliciting feedback from Members of both parties who have reviewed it.


The original memo is available here and here. Key points are here, a charge and response is here, and a summary of FISA Title I is here.



OFFICIAL: FISA Memo Released




Feb 032018

Comey’s “That’s it” response is extremely telling. He was expecting the House Intelligence Committee Report to contain something even more explosive.

House Intelligence Committee Report

What he doesn’t know is the strategy that is in play right now. Devin Nunes, Chuck Grassley, Bob Goodlatte, and Inspector General Michael Horowitz have coordinated efforts to get all of this information into the public.

Remember when Comey called Trump “Crazy” for suggesting he was being spied on? And now we learn the House Intelligence Committee Report shows that Comey signed off on the FISA application.

And we also know he leaked classified memos through his Columbia Law Professor “friend” Dan Richman to prompt a Special Counsel by his own words. WEASEL… Never Forget!

The real question: Was this really the first time the FBI and DOJ were weaponized to influence a US election?

We know the IRS was targeting the Tea Party during the previous election. There were studies conducted that show that the Tea Party would have swung the 2012 election to Mitt Romney had they not been targeted.





Feb 022018

OFFICIAL: FISA Memo Released. Read The Official Document Here.

House Intelligence Committee Report On FISA Abuses:

Look inside: James Comey personally approved the illegal FISA warrants!

One word: TREASON – The whole lot of them: Hillary campaign, DNC, FBI, DOJ, Obama, McCain – No more “get out of jail, FREE” cards – These people have tried to undermine our Republic!

ne word: TREASON - The whole lot of them: Hillary campaign, DNC, FBI, DOJ, Obama, McCain - No more "get out of jail, FREE" cards - These people have tried to undermine our Republic!

Steele is British i.e. FOREIGN … they conspired with FOREIGN entities to bring down a U.S. PRESIDENT!


The FISA application never mentioned to the judge that Steele was paid by DNC and Clinton campaign

Steele spoke to Yahoo News at the direction of Fusion GPS, so Yahoo News is not a reliable source for FISA application







Feb 022018

It’s coming!

BOOM! #MEMODAY Remember This Day In History - 2/2/2018





Jan 292018

BOMBSHELL: Obama pardoned General Cartwright on his last day in office, for leaking secrets to the NYT about Stuxnet (the US-Israeli cyber attacks on Iran). Treason!

Obama Pardoned Peter Strzok's Relative, General Cartwright, On His Last Day In Office

1. Obama pardoned General Cartwright on his last day in office, for leaking secrets to the NYT about Stuxnet (the US-Israeli cyber attacks on Iran). Oh – and if this incredible thread is true, he just happens to be the Uncle of Peter Strzok’s first cousin, Devin.

2. Cartwright, ‘Obama’s favorite General’, was a key member of Obama’s NatSec team and head of the U.S. Strategic Command. His leak to the media wasn’t revealed until 2016. He later pleaded guilty for lying to FBI agents pursuing an investigation into the leak.

3. In March 2015, the Washington Post reported that the sensitive leak investigation had “stalled amid concerns that a prosecution in federal court could force the government to confirm” information about the highly classified program.

Who was the investigator?


4. Now – the relevant NYT article based on Cartwright’s leaks portrays an aggressive Obama ramping up cyber attacks on Iran.


5. Notice the date? June 1, 2012. Which seems odd, because Obama had invested siginficant time negotiating with the mullahs that year as part of the 5+1.


Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy With Iran

6. Remember, Obama had done a 180 degree change in US policy on Iran on April 8, 2009.


U.S. to Join Iran Talks Over Nuclear Program

7. By 2012, Obama’s administration had also turned a blind eye to Hezbollah running a massive drugs and money laundering scheme within the USA.


8. Obama was almost certainly spying on domestic opponents of his Iran deal as far back as 2010.


9. So WHY would Obama’s ‘favorite General and key NatSec advisor leak to the NYT about Stuxnet, just when Obama was pushing hard to get friendly with the mullahs? Obama MUST have known about & approved this leak (remember he pardoned the General later).

10. Remember, Operation Olympic Games was NOT an Obama initiative. It started under Dubya in 2006 and has been described as ‘probably the most significant covert manipulation of the electromagnetic spectrum since World War II (Enigma).


Operation Olympic Games

11. Who did the US work with to develop the virus? Israel.

12. Until that leak by Gen Cartwright, no government had officially been confirmed as responsible for the development & use of Stuxnet. It basically signalled classified information – to THE MULLAHS.

13. On August 15, 2012, Dishonorable Disclosures, a 22-minute documentary film is released by the Special Operations OPSEC group. Their accusation?

14. ‘The Obama administration ‘willfully leaked the existence of STUXNET (a computer worm used against Iran), allowing our enemies to learn more of our secrets and of our operations.’


Dishonorable Disclosures

They are ridiculed and smeared by Obama and his press dogs.

15. In summary: Obama and his stooges were leaking classified information to the NYT to tip off the Iranians about the US-Israeli collaboration behind the Stuxnet virus, using media slaves.

In this case the stooge was Generated Cartwright, a key Obama insider.

16. They were aiding and abetting an adversary of the USA, Iran. And placing an ally, Israel, in an extremely difficult position.

This at a time when they were protecting Hezbollah within the USA.

One word: TREASON.

17. And of the thread I RTd at #1 is true, Gen Cartwright is related to none other than Peter Strzok, FBI agent who Trump has accused of treason.

The Cartrwight conveniently pardoned by Obama on his last day.

Yes – you DID read that right.

18. We talk about Clinton’s many crimes, but when it comes to hard core treason and corruption, all roads lead back to one man:

Barack Hussein Obama.

He is going down.

19. Oh have no fear. Hillary will be indicted and tried for her many crimes.

But now I have NO doubt that Obama is Trump’s #1 target. And that Trump will make that sob pay BIGLY for what he did to America.


The end.



The Context Around The Peter Strzok And Lisa Page Text Messages

 Political  Comments Off on The Context Around The Peter Strzok And Lisa Page Text Messages
Jan 242018

Must Read Peter Strzok/Lisa Page Timeline by Rep. Mark Meadows

The Context Around The Peter Strzok And Lisa Page Text Messages

This is the biggest political corruption case in American History.

Peter Strzok/Lisa Page Timeline by Rep. Mark Meadows:

Remember the key figure here: Peter Strzok, the former deputy of counter-intelligence at the FBI. Guy who ran the 2016 Clinton investigation, who interviewed key witnesses including Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, and Hillary Clinton. Former Mueller team member. Strzok is the guy here

We have all these anti-Trump texts in 2016 from Peter Strzok, talking about an “insurance policy” in case Trump gets elected President. We have texts from Strzok to Lisa Page saying “We can’t take the risk” Trump wins the Presidency. By itself, that’s a huge problem.

But there’s more. We now have a text between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, FBI agents, directly talking about the pressure to finish the Hillary Clinton investigation–a text which occurred right after Donald J. Trump became the presumptive GOP nominee

We have a text from May 4, 2016 where Peter Strzok says: “Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE…” (or ‘Mid-Year Exam,’ the FBI’s code name for the Clinton investigation.) May 4, 2016 is important–because it’s when Ted Cruz dropped out. That day, Trump was the nominee.

So we have Peter Strzok, the deputy of FBI counter-intelligence and lead Clinton investigator, who we already know blasted Trump in text messages, talking about the need to end the Clinton investigation… right after he knew Hillary would be running against Trump. Major problem.

Now pause, and circle to FBI Director Comey. Remember Director Comey’s exoneration letter? The letter from 2016 that, at first, called Hillary Clinton “grossly negligent” but was mysteriously changed to “extremely careless”? That change is massively important.

Remember, “gross negligence” under the “reasonable person standard” is a crime. “Extreme carelessness” is not, however. That change is hugely significant. Had Dir. Comey called Hillary “grossly negligent” in his letter, he would’ve essentially been saying she committed a crime.

Now take that letter change, and go back to Peter Strzok. We have email documentation that suggests the “gross negligence” claim in Director Comey’s exoneration letter was changed to “extremely careless” between May 4, 2016 and May 6, 2016… by none other than Peter Strzok.

Think about how important that is. We have a text from Peter Strzok talking about the pressure to end the Clinton investigation, and then–within 48 hours–documents suggesting Peter Strzok changed Dir. Comey’s letter from criminal charges to just “carelessness.” That’s major.

Folks, this stinks to high heaven. If this is anything what it looks like–the FBI changing course on investigation, putting their thumb on the scale to undermine Donald Trump and essentially help Hillary Clinton–that is as wrong as it gets. This demands further investigation.

And remember, this doesn’t even address a host of other questions! The dossier. The Carter Page FISA application (that they still won’t show us). The 5 months of mysteriously “missing” Page/Strzok texts. The FBI communicating with Fusion GPS/DNC-hired Christopher Steele. Come on.

This is not party politics. This is not partisan bickering. This is an issue that gets at the very heart of who we are as a nation. If any officials at the FBI were engaged in this kind of behavior, we need to know.

Bottom line:

Tell us the truth. Tell us the truth about what happened with the Clinton investigation, the 2016 election, and leading up to this “collusion” investigation. All of it. Americans deserve the truth.





Jan 212018

The Insurance Policy – An Epoch Graphic Showing The Connections Related To The “Phoney” Trump Dossier

The Insurance Policy To Prevent Trump From Becoming President

What’s contained in the House Intelligence Committee memo on FISA abuses? The amazing graphic below and great in-depth reporting by Epoch Times may provide a hint.

It’s crazy to think that this exact image could be used in history books someday. This WAY bigger than Watergate. In fact, Watergate was a candle, this is 10,000 suns.

A graphic showing the web of connections related to the Trump dossier

The Insurance Policy
Click to enlarge

From Epoch Times:

How did a piece of opposition research, described by former FBI Director James Comey as both “salacious and unverified,” become the driving force behind the allegations that Trump colluded with Russian authorities?

Research conducted by The Epoch Times, using public sources, shows a web of connections related to the dossier reaching the highest levels of the FBI, CIA, and the Obama administration.

Paid for by the Clinton Campaign and the DNC, and produced by Fusion GPS—whose other clients include the Russian government—the dossier appears to have been the basis for the FBI’s investigation into Donald Trump.

The FBI used the dossier, in part, to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump’s team, according to national security reporter Sarah Carter. Two of President Barack Obama’s top officials also surveilled the communications of Trump’s team, both before and after the elections.

Read more…


Peter Strzok Text To Lisa Page References Plot To Take Out Trump