Project Sunshine: The Secret Government Study on the Effects of Nuclear Fallout

In the early 1950s, the United States government was conducting a secret study to measure the effects of nuclear fallout on the human body. The study, code-named Project Sunshine, involved collecting the bodies of dead babies and children and examining them for signs of radiation exposure.

In the early 1950s, the United States government was conducting a secret study to measure the effects of nuclear fallout on the human body. The study, code-named Project Sunshine, involved collecting the bodies of dead babies and children and examining them for signs of radiation exposure.

The study was authorized by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1953. The Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), which was responsible for overseeing the study, recruited pathologists from across the country to participate. The pathologists were instructed to collect the bodies of all babies and children who died within 10 days of birth, regardless of the cause of death.

The bodies were then shipped to the AEC’s Human Tissue Repository in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. There, the pathologists examined the bodies for signs of radiation exposure. They looked for things like radioactive particles in the bones and tissues, and changes in the cells.

The study continued for several years, and the AEC collected the bodies of over 1,000 babies and children. The results of the study were never published, but they were eventually declassified in the early 2000s.

The study revealed that even low levels of radiation exposure can have a significant impact on the human body. The babies and children who were exposed to radiation had a higher risk of developing cancer, leukemia, and other health problems.

The study also showed that the effects of radiation exposure can be passed down from generation to generation. The children of the babies and children who were exposed to radiation were also at an increased risk of developing health problems.

Project Sunshine is a reminder of the dangers of nuclear fallout. It is also a reminder of the lengths that the government will go to in order to protect its citizens from harm.

The Secretive Origins of Project Sunshine

Project Sunshine was born out of the Cold War fear of nuclear war. In the early 1950s, the United States and the Soviet Union were engaged in a nuclear arms race. Both countries were conducting nuclear tests, and there was a growing concern about the potential effects of nuclear fallout on the population.

The AEC was tasked with studying the effects of nuclear fallout. The agency conducted a number of studies, including Project Sunshine. Project Sunshine was designed to collect data on the short-term effects of radiation exposure. The AEC hoped that the data from Project Sunshine would help them to develop better ways to protect the population from nuclear fallout.

The Secrecy of Project Sunshine

Project Sunshine was kept secret for many years. The AEC did not want to alarm the public about the potential dangers of nuclear fallout. The agency also did not want to give the Soviet Union any information about its research.

The secrecy of Project Sunshine was finally lifted in the early 2000s. The AEC declassified the study, and the results were made public. The release of the study sparked a wave of controversy. Many people were outraged that the government had conducted secret experiments on dead babies and children.

The Legacy of Project Sunshine

Project Sunshine is a reminder of the dark side of the Cold War. It is also a reminder of the lengths that the government will go to in order to protect its citizens from harm. The study has also raised important questions about the ethics of scientific research.

The results of Project Sunshine have been used to improve our understanding of the effects of radiation exposure. The study has also helped to develop better ways to protect people from nuclear fallout. However, the secrecy of the study has also damaged the public’s trust in the government.

Project Sunshine is a complex and controversial issue. There is no easy answer to whether or not the study was justified. However, the study is a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in scientific research.



How To Of The Day: How To Survive A Nuclear Attack

If you want to be prepared for a nuclear attack, here’s a science-based guide to help you get there.

 

 

European Radiation Causes Concerns

No One Can Figure Out What’s Behind a Mysterious Radiation Spike Across Europe

European Radiation Causes Concerns

A baffling bloom of radiation detected spreading throughout Europe earlier this year has stumped scientists and spawned sinister conspiracy theories.

The ‘cloud’ of Iodine-131 first appeared near the border of Norway and Russia a few weeks ago and was subsequently spotted by a number of nearby countries, including France and Finland.

Authorities say that it appeared to be an isolated incident as radiation levels returned to normal shortly thereafter.

That said, the cause of the event remains a mystery, which has led some to propose the troubling theory that the radiation came from a clandestine nuclear test by Russia.

Others have expressed concerns that the radiation may be come from some kind of nuclear incident that is being kept secret.

The enlisting of a specialized US Air Force jet designed to ‘sniff’ radiation levels has only fueled the conspiratorial speculation that something nefarious may have occurred.

However, experts are attempting to quell such concerns and explain that since Iodine-131 was the sole radioactive substance detected, the origin of the bloom was probably an inadvertent leak at a pharmaceutical plant.

Their reasoning is that Iodine-131 is used in some cancer medications produced in the region and a similar spike in 2011 was eventually traced back to such a facility.

And so, while mysterious radiation coming from the border of Russia is understandably worrisome in these chaotic times, it would appear the bloom is the merely the product of bad medicine making.

Small amounts of nuclear radiation spread across Europe last month, and no one can figure out why.

First detected over the Norway-Russia border in January, the radioactive Iodine-131 bloom was then found over several European countries, and while unsubstantiated rumors of nuclear testing by Russia have been cropping up, officials say it’s most likely linked to an unreported pharmaceutical mishap.

While the radiation spike happened in January, officials in Finland and France have only just gone public with information on the incident, announcing that after the spike was detected in Norway, it appeared in Finland, Poland, Czechia (Czech Republic), Germany, France and Spain, until the end of January.

When asked why Norway didn’t inform the public last month, when it was the first to detect the radiation in its northernmost county, Finnmark, Astrid Liland from the Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority told the Barents Observer:

“The measurements at Svanhovd in January were very, very low. So were the measurements made in neighbouring countries, like Finland. The levels raise no concern for humans or the environment. Therefore, we believe this had no news value.”

As France’s nuclear safety authority, the IRSN, announced last week, the actual amount of radioactive Iodine-131 in Europe’s ground-level atmosphere in January “raise no health concerns”, and has since returned to normal.

But what’s most disconcerting about the event isn’t the level of radiation that spread through Europe – it’s the fact that no one can say what actually happened.

European Radiation Stirs Concerns
What we do know is that Iodine-131 has a half-life of just eight days, so detecting it in the atmosphere is proof of a recent release.

“The release was probably of recent origin. Further than this, it is impossible to speculate,” Brian Gornall from Britain’s Society for Radiological Protection told Ben Sullivan at Motherboard.

Right now, the best bet is that the origin of the radioactive Iodine-131 is somewhere in Eastern Europe – something that conspiracy theorists have latched onto as evidence that Russia performed a nuclear test in the Arctic.

But there is no evidence of this taking place, and the fact that only Iodine-131 – and no other radioactive substances – were detected strongly suggests this is not the answer.

“It was rough weather in the period when the measurements were made, so we can’t trace the release back to a particular location. Measurements from several places in Europe might indicate it comes from Eastern Europe,” Liland told the Barents Observer.

Based on the particular isotope, experts are saying it’s far more likely that the radiation spike is the result of some kind of pharmaceutical factory leak, seeing as Iodine-131 is used widely in treating certain types of cancer.

“Since only Iodine-131 was measured, and no other radioactive substances, we think it originates from a pharmaceutical company producing radioactive drugs,” Liland told Motherboard. “Iodine-131 is used for treatment of cancer.”

And, oddly enough, the case for pharmaceuticals being behind the mess has a surprisingly similar parallel to back it up – an almost identical event occurred in 2011, when low levels of radioactive Iodine-131 were detected in several European countries for a few weeks.

At the time of the announcement, officials were also at a loss to explain the spike in Iodine-131, but quickly ruled out a link to nuclear power plants.

“If it came from a reactor we would find other elements in the air,” Didier Champion, then head of environment and intervention at the IRSN, told Reuters in 2011.

Interestingly, a paper came out just last week confirming that the source of the 2011 Iodine-131 leak was a faulty filter system at the Institute of Isotopes Ltd in Budapest, Hungary, which produces a wide variety of radioactive isotopes for medical treatment and research.

The investigation is still ongoing for the 2017 leak, with the US Air Force deploying its WC-135 nuclear explosion ‘sniffer’ aircraft to the UK last week to help narrow down the source.

Hopefully researchers can nail down what exactly happened here, so factory owners – if they are to blame this time around – can ensure these kinds of leaks don’t continue.

Because while both events posed no health risk to humans, it’s really not something any manufacturer should be risking.

Source…

 

NUKEMAP

The nuclear bomb simulator that lets users nuke their home cities.

NUKEMAP

NUKEMAP is an interactive map using Google Maps API and unclassified nuclear weapons effects data, created by Alex Wellerstein, a historian of science at the Stevens Institute of Technology who studies the history of nuclear weapons. The initial version was created in February 2012, with major upgrades in July 2013, which enables users to model the explosion of nuclear weapons (contemporary, historical, or of any given arbitrary yield) on virtually any terrain and at virtually any altitude of their choice. A variation of the script, NUKEMAP3D, features rough models of mushroom clouds in 3D, scaled to their appropriate sizes. NUKEMAP3D doesn’t work on most browsers anymore for NPAPI plugins are no longer supported by them.

The computer simulation of the effects of nuclear detonations has been described both as “stomach-churning” (by Wellerstein himself) and as “the most fun I’ve had with Google Maps since… well, possibly ever” despite the admittedly abjectly grim nature of the subject. Originally intended in part as a pedagogical device to illustrate the stark difference in scale between fission and fusion bombs, more than three million people as of 2012 have exploded some 30 million virtual nuclear warheads; having gone viral, the increased popularity of the website necessitated a move to new servers. The website averages five “nukes” per visitor. According to the site’s own counter, in November 2016 users had simulated over 90 million nuclear explosions.

The NUKEMAP was a finalist for the National Science Foundation’s Visualization Challenge in 2014.

Users can select the location and size of the bombs.
The site shows the spread of the mushroom cloud including casualty numbers.

NUKEMAP
This map created by nuclear weapon historian Alex Wellerstein demonstrates the fallout caused by 2.3 megaton bomb dropped on Washington. It was modeled on the Soviet weapons held during the Cuban Missile Crisis of the 1960s

 

Load More