Apr 042017
 

The Great Communicator, Ronald Reagan, explains the true meaning of Fascism.

In a Dec. 14, 1975 interview with 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace, Ronald Reagan discussed his political philosophy, saying that “the heart of my philosophy is much more libertarianism, than –.” Wallace then interrupted, “Well, that’s the fashionable word these days, I guess. A conservative is no longer just that, he’s a libertarian.”

Reagan continued, “It always has been. How do we call a liberal? You know, someone very profoundly once said many years ago that if fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism.”

“And what is fascism?” Reagan said. “Fascism is private ownership, private enterprise, but total government control and regulation. Well, isn’t this the liberal philosophy?”

“The conservative, so-called, is the one that says less government, get off my back, get out of my pocket, and let me have more control of my own destiny,” he said.

 

 
via

Apr 012017
 
Joke Of The Day: AH A motorcycle police officer stops a driver for shooting through a red light. The driver is a real jerk, steps out of his car and comes striding toward the officer, demanding to know why he is being harassed by the Gestapo!

So the officer calmly tells him of the red light violation. The motorist instantly goes on a tirade, questioning the officer’s ancestry, sexual orientation, etc., in rather explicit offensive terms.

The tirade goes on and on without the officer saying anything.

When the officer finishes writing the ticket he puts an “AH” in the lower right corner of the narrative portion of the ticket. He then hands it to The ‘violator’ for his signature. The guy signs the ticket angrily, and when presented with his copy points to the “AH” and demands to know what it stands for.

The officer says, “That’s so when we go to court, I’ll remember that you’re an asshole!”

Two months later they’re in court. The ‘violator’ has a bad driving record with a high number of points and is in danger of losing his license, so he hired a lawyer to represent him.

On the stand the officer testifies to seeing the man run through the red light.

Under cross-examination the defense attorney asks;“Officer is this a reasonable facsimile of the ticket that you issued to my client ?”

Officer responds, “Yes, sir, that is the defendant’s copy, his signature and mine, same number at the top.”

Lawyer: “Officer, is there any particular marking or notation on this ticket you don’t normally make ?”

“Yes, sir, in the lower right corner of the narrative there is an “AH,” underlined.”

“What does the “AH” stand for, officer?”

“Aggressive and hostile, Sir.”

“Aggressive and hostile?”

“Yes, Sir.

“Officer, are you sure it doesn’t stand for asshole?”

Well, Sir, you know your client better than I do.

 

 

 

Vegan Attacks Chicken Truck

 Funny  Comments Off on Vegan Attacks Chicken Truck
Mar 052017
 
Vegan attacks chicken truck and, yes, alcohol was heavily involved. I mean, no one said vegans could not drink!
Vegan Attacks Chicken Truck

Was the truck driver egging her on?

A woman told authorities she intentionally drove into a chicken truck because she is vegan, according to a report.

The Athens Banner-Herald reported that Judith M. Armstrong, 26, was arrested at her home in Comer after the Feb. 21 incident which took place in Hull, Georgia.

A truck driver reported a car hit the side of his truck, deputies said. When he applied his brakes, the car again drove into the truck.

The car drove from the scene, but the responding deputy found pieces of the car as well as the license plate, the newspaper reported.

When deputies went to her home, Armstrong told them “she was a vegan and hit the truck due to it being a chicken truck,” according to the Banner-Herald.

Armstrong was charged with DUI, hit-and-run, obstruction and aggressive driving, the newspaper reported.

 

Feb 282017
 

There are some people out there that know exactly why Donald Trump was elected. Apparently British Member of Parliament Nigel Evans is one of them.

During the British Petitions Committee Debate on President Trump’s State Visit to the UK, Nigel Evans defended President Trump, pointing out the irony of Mr. Trump being condemned for actually delivering on his promises, how there is no evidence to support the charge that he is a racist, how condemning Mr. Trump would be also condemning the 61 million United States people that voted for him.

Mr. Evans also points out that if the American people wanted the usual stuff (Hillary Clinton/ establishment) that it was on the ballot and the people decided against it and in favor of Donald Trump.

Sit back and enjoy his passionate defense of President Trump and the American voters!

After protests and petitions against President Donald Trump’s invitation for a state visit to the United Kingdom this year from Prime Minister Theresa May, Welsh members of Parliament debated the issue Monday.

Paul Flynn said the U.K. should “set an example” by not allowing the Trump visit.

“We’ve had people here who are very unsavory characters,” Flynn said, according to the BBC. “Certainly we can’t try to imitate the errors of the past, we should set an example by making sure we don’t make those mistakes again.”

But Nigel Evans, a conservative member of Parliament, stood up and blasted opponents of the Trump visit.

“For those who find it difficult to understand that the American people voted for Donald Trump, get over it because he’s president of the United States,” Evans said.

He added that “we have to ask ourselves why is it that people felt so left behind that they made the democratic decisions that they have” and then compared last year’s Brexit vote to the Trump election.

“Just like we had the forgotten people in United Kingdom, there are the forgotten people in the United States of America,” Evans continued. “We may not like some of the things that he says, and I certainly don’t like some of the things that he’s said in the past, but I do respect the fact that he stood on a platform which he is now delivering. He’s going to go down in history as being roundly condemned for being the only politician to deliver on his promises.”

Evans added that he’s seen “no evidence” that Trump is “racist” — which drew a number of gasps in the crowd — and that attacks on Trump are, in effect, attacks on “the American people.”

“If they wanted more of the same or the ‘usual stuff,’ well that was on the ballot paper,” he said. “But they decided by the majority of states in the Electoral College, as it works, that they wanted Donald Trump.”
 

Obama’s Treatment Of The Mainstream Media

 Political  Comments Off on Obama’s Treatment Of The Mainstream Media
Feb 252017
 

Remember when Obama framed the Mainstream Media as the opposition party?

“We’re going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent,” said Anita Dunn, the White House communications director, in a telephone interview on Sunday. “As they are undertaking a war against Barack Obama and the White House, we don’t need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave.”

Obama's Treatment Of The Mainstream Media

Attacking the news media is a time-honored White House tactic but to an unusual degree, the Obama administration has narrowed its sights to one specific organization, the Fox News Channel, calling it, in essence, part of the political opposition.

“We’re going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent,” said Anita Dunn, the White House communications director, in a telephone interview on Sunday. “As they are undertaking a war against Barack Obama and the White House, we don’t need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave.”

Her comments are only the latest in the volatile exchange between the administration and the top-rated network, which is owned by the News Corporation, controlled by Rupert Murdoch. Last month, Roger Ailes, the chairman of Fox News, and David Axelrod, a senior adviser to President Obama, met for coffee in New York, in what Politico, which last week broke that news, labeled a “Fox summit.”

While neither party has said what was discussed, some have speculated that a truce, or at least an adjustment in tone, was at issue. (Mr. Ailes and Mr. Obama reportedly reached a temporary accord after a meeting in mid-2008.) But shots are still being fired, which animates the idea that both sides see benefits in the feud.

Fox seems to relish the controversy.

“Instead of governing, the White House continues to be in campaign mode, and Fox News is the target of their attack mentality,” Michael Clemente, the channel’s senior vice president for news, said in a statement on Sunday. “Perhaps the energy would be better spent on the critical issues that voters are worried about.”

Source…

Or how about the time, back in 2008, when OBAMA Kicked reporters off his plane because their papers had endorsed John McCain?

OBAMA Kicked reporters off his plane
 

Women Liberated From ISIS

 Political  Comments Off on Women Liberated From ISIS
Feb 232017
 

While Liberals in the West are busy celebrating Hijabs as a symbol of diversity, women freed from ISIS rip them off and burn them as symbols of oppression

Freedom rings louder than fascist oppression!

 
Source…

Strategies Of Manipulation

 Information, Political  Comments Off on Strategies Of Manipulation
Feb 232017
 

The Strategies and Techniques of the Elite for the Manipulation of Public Opinion and Society

Strategies Of Manipulation

1. The strategy of distraction

The prime element of social control is the strategy of distraction consisting of deviating the public attention from the important problems and from the mutations decided by the political and economic elites by means of the flooding technique or the continuous inundation of distractions and insignificant information.

The strategy of distraction is equally indispensable to prevent the public from getting interested in the essential knowledge in areas of science, economy, psychology, neurology and cybernetics.

“To maintain the public attention distracted, away form the true social problems, captivated by subjects of no real importance. To maintain the public busy, busy, without any time to think; going back to the farm with the other animals.”

2. Create problems, then offer solutions

This method is also known as “problem-reaction-solution”. It creates a problem, a foreseen “situation” to provoke a certain reaction in the public in order to make this one the demanding force of measures that are desired to be accepted.For example: to let urban violence develop and intensify, or to organize bloody terrorist attempts in order for the public to demand laws of security or police-oriented ones in detriment of freedom. Or also: to create an economic crisis to make accepted the backward movement of social rights and the breaking down of public services as a necessary evil.

3. The strategy of degradation

To make accepted an unacceptable measure it is sufficient to apply it progressively, in a “degraded” manner, over a duration of 10 years. It is in this way that radically new socio-economic conditions have been imposed during the years 1980 to 1990. Massive unemployment, lacking, flexibility, relocation, salaries that no longer secure a decent income, so many changes that would have provoked a revolution should they be abruptly applied.

4. The strategy of differing

Another way of making accepted an unpopular decision is to present it as “painful but necessary”, obtaining the agreement of the public in the moment for the future application. It is easier to accept a future sacrifice than an immediate one. Firstly, because the effort is not deployed immediately.Next, because the public, the people, have always the tendency to naïvely hope that “all will go better tomorrow” and that the demanded sacrifice may be avoided. Anyway, this allows more time for the public to be accustomed to the idea and to accept it with resignation when the moment comes. Recent example: the move to the Euro and the loss of their economic and monetary sovereignty have been accepted by the European countries from 1994 to 1995 for their application in the year 2001. Another example: the multilateral agreements ofALCA (or FTAA) that the United States have imposed in the year 2001 to the countries of all the American continent (Central and South America) in spite of their reticence, conceding an application and the coming into force in the year 2005.

5. To address the public as children of younger age

The majority of the publicity “spots” addresses the public at large with the use of a discourse, arguments, personages, and a tone particularly infantile, many times near the weak, as if the spectator were a child of younger age or a mental handicapped. The more it intends to seek the deception of the spectator or listener, the more it is its tendency to adopt an infantile tone. Why? If it is addressed to a person as if he or she had 12 year of age, then, by reason of suggestion, he or she would also have, with a certain probability, a response or reaction that is lacking of a critical sense same as is the case of a person of 12 years of age.”

6. To utilize an emotional aspect rather than a reflection

To make use of the emotional aspect is a classic technique for making a short-circuit to the rational analysis, and hence to the critical sense of individuals. Besides, the utilization of the emotional registry allows us to open an access door to the unconscious to implant or to insert ideas, wishes, fears or worries, pulsations, or to induce behaviors.

7. To maintain the public in ignorance and stupidity

To make it in a way that the public is unable to comprehend the technologies and the methods utilized for their control and slavery. “The quality of the education given to the lower social classes must be the poorest or the most mediocre possible, in a way that the breach of ignorance that isolates the lower classes from the upper social classes must be and remain incomprehensible to the lower social classes.”

8. To promote in the public complacency with mediocrity

To promote in the public the idea that being stupid, vulgar and uneducated is “cool”.

9. To replace revolt with guilt

To make the individual believe that he himself is the only responsible for his misfortune, the cause of the insufficiency of his intelligence, of his capacities, or his efforts. Thus, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual self-devaluates and self-blames, which generates a depressive state, one of its effects is the inhibition of action. And without action, there is no revolution!

10. To know individuals better than they know themselves

In the course of the last 50 years, the accelerated advances of science have generated a growing breach between the knowledge of the public and that one possessed and utilized by the leading elites. Thanks to biology, neurology and applied psychology, the “system” has achieved an advanced knowledge of the human being, both physically and psychologically. The system has been able to know the common individual better than what the individual know about himself. This means that in the majority of cases, the system possesses a greater control and a greater power over individuals than what individuals have over themselves.

 

Feb 202017
 

Swedish Media Admits To Censoring Stories For The Last Five Years On Migrant Crime

The United Nations recently declared that by the year 2030, Sweden would become a Third World country. This is absolutely appalling and this should NEVER be allowed to happen. Not in Sweden, the UK, France, Canada or any other Western nation. Just what will it take for the so-called ‘Leaders’ in the West to come to the obvious realization that if you import Third World refugees in great-enough numbers into your country, then eventually, the Third World is what will become of your own country?

Blinds journalists information and news for not favoring SD? The statement dismissed as tin foil hat theory. But journalists who I am in contact with testifies problems.

Jesper Strömbäck, Professor of Media and Communications, said the other day: “The media would cover up any berries in my judgment, strong features of the conspiracy theory.” (Summary, 12/1). Sometimes opt out of information about news values, he points out.

And it is true generally. Meanwhile, for example Skånska Dagbladets then editor Jan A Johansson, the journalist Björn Hagers book “Party Problem”, if SD acknowledges that data has been omitted to avoid a “hell damage to society”.

The other day I asked the question of social media: “You who worked as / journalists. Have you been part of the editorial board wanted to downplay or avoid substances because ‘can benefit sd’? “Journalists in different ages, men and women, with different backgrounds and from different media, approached him. Those who responded publicly on Twitter gave mostly no answers, they had not encountered it. Those who approached him privately gave a more troubling picture.

A journalist who has conveyed the news on integration and immigration for many years expressed that “this topic is super sensitive.” There is a younger generation who think black and white, according to the person: “If anything the interviewee says complicates the thesis and one’s own worldview you cut it out of the story.” When the journalist himself has let different voices to be heard, it has led to attacks from other journalists. Nowadays, I am very cautious stories, tell the person. “Can not be bothered to have enemies,” is the explanation.

Another journalist that contact has been working on a few different media newsrooms. “Before the last election in 2010, when I remember especially a completely bizarre discussion, the reporters at the coffee machine stood talking about ‘how should we respond to the Sweden Democrats, we can not take them as an ordinary party'” he says. And testify directives from the new boss to “take it easy” when he examines the integration-related topics.

The call to be cautious return. One person has been worshiped be there when asked about problems at an accommodation for unaccompanied youths arrived at the numbers. Another person reported that a senior colleague with strong political views have stopped the story about mess at an asylum accommodation. Others describe a caution with the choice of words, of news or identifying data in order not to promote xenophobia.

A journalist who has worked on several major editorial says that in all workplaces has been a pronounced or unspoken policy not to promote SD and xenophobia. And especially remember the honor murder of Pela Atroshi: “We did not write a line about it.”
These journalists are no foil hats. On the contrary, highlights several that most journalists and news executives are honest people. Yet the problem is there.

The country’s media newsrooms need to consider a lap: we shall be pronounced against SD? If not; How do we ensure that journalism was shot? It is easy to shout “conspiracy theory” to any criticism. The harder it is to see their own role in that confidence in the media falls, while the SD sites celebrating victory after victory.

Source…