The world we live in… The National Enquirer is real news and the The New York Times is the tabloid?
The response to all charges against the memo, further cementing its validity and destroying all of the Left’s arguments.
A clear and powerful rebuttal to the attacks!
This needs to be shared far and wide.
CHARGE: The Majority failed to comply with House and Committee Rules.
RESPONSE: All House and Committee rules were complied with and followed, as prescribed, from the requirement to notice a business meeting, to make available classified executive session material to the House, and to publically disclose the material. i
CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine the Special Counsel’s ongoing Russia investigation.
RESPONSE: The memo has nothing to do with the Special Counsel’s investigation, and is intended to expose past abuses of the FISA process, namely Senior DOJ and FBI officials’ use of unverified opposition research. That research was financed by a presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, and resulted in a surveillance warrant on an American citizen. Further, consistent with its bipartisan commitment not to impede any ongoing investigation, the Committee has not sought documents or information post-dating the appointment of the Special Counsel in May 2017.
CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine DOJ and FBI.
RESPONSE: The memo is intended to hold some senior DOJ and FBI officials accountable for abuses of the FISA process, consistent with the Committee’s constitutional responsibilities. The Committee has not only the right, but the responsibility, to conduct rigorous oversight of potential abuses—including by making information publicly available— on behalf of the American people.
CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine the men and women of DOJ and FBI.
RESPONSE: The memo is focused on abuses by a small number of senior leaders. The Committee’s fulfillment of its constitutional duty supports the hard working men and women of law enforcement and the intelligence community by enabling effective, efficient and constitutional oversight of their agencies.
CHARGE: The memo unfairly targets government officials like Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
RESPONSE: This is patently false. The memo simply states that Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and former FBI Deputy Director McCabe were among the senior DOJ and FBI officials who signed off on a FISA application that included, as a substantial and essential part, the DNC and Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier.
CHARGE: The memo undermines recently-reauthorized FISA Section 702.
RESPONSE: The memo has nothing to do with Section 702, which targets foreigners located overseas. As specified in the memo, the FISA order authorizing surveillance on Carter Page was not obtained under Title VII.
CHARGE: DOJ and FBI did nothing wrong by using the Steele dossier in a FISA application.
RESPONSE: DOJ and FBI senior leaders had four separate opportunities, but failed each time, to adequately investigate or disclose to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) the role of the DNC and Clinton campaign as the funders and beneficiaries of the Steele dossier—even though its political origins were known to numerous senior DOJ and FBI officials. Additionally, FBI’s reliance on Steele’s past credibility was misplaced, since he concealed from the FBI unauthorized media contacts with numerous outlets and his anti-Trump bias, which was known by a senior DOJ official.
CHARGE: The memo, and DOJ and FBI’s use of the Steele dossier in a FISA application, are no big deal.
RESPONSE: It is important for the American people to judge the facts presented in the memo, which Members of the Committee and House assessed to be of substantial public interest. But it is simply astonishing that Democrats would argue the memo is insignificant given the extreme lengths they went to prevent its release.
CHARGE: The memo is nothing more than a collection of partisan talking points.
RESPONSE: The memo is the result of a nearly year long investigative effort by the Committee, including document review and witness interviews. As the public can see, it sets forth a series of facts uncovered by Committee investigators in the face of attempts efforts by senior DOJ and FBI officials to stonewall the Committee’s, and contains no partisan rhetoric or personal attacks.
CHARGE: The memo represents an irresponsible release of highly-sensitive classified information.
RESPONSE: The complaints from the left about Congress doing its job, and Democrats’ sudden opposition to transparency, represent a hypocritical and partisan attempt to prevent the public from learning about the memo’s contents. Contrary to unauthorized leaks of classified information so prevalent in Washington today, the memo’s release occurred pursuant to the Committee’s oversight function and a process laid out in House Rules that balances the public and national interests. Some have falsely claimed that the memo contains “an immense amount of classified information.” However, it was specifically crafted to exclude information that might damage national security and has now been declassified following an executive branch review. This authorized, limited release of formerly classified information serves the public interest, and the only “source or method” specifically mentioned is Christopher Steele—who was terminated as an FBI source for unauthorized disclosures to the press.
CHARGE: It is irresponsible to release the memo over DOJ and FBI’s objections.
RESPONSE: It is disappointing that senior officials at DOJ and FBI would continue to attempt to obstruct the Committee’s efforts to share with the American people information related to surveillance abuses at these agencies. The Committee notes that both DOJ and FBI—along with other stakeholders—had an opportunity to provide input into the executive branch review process, which resulted in the President’s decision to declassify the document in full.
CHARGE: DOJ and FBI had good reason to suspect Carter Page of being a Russian agent.
RESPONSE: While many unverified claims have been made by both Christopher Steele and Committee Democrats, the focus of the memo is not Carter Page. The focus of the memo is the Steele dossier—funded by the DNC and Clinton campaign, and described as “salacious and unverified” by former FBI Director Comey—that formed a substantial and essential part of a secret court application for a warrant on an American citizen.
CHARGE: According to FBI, there are “material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”
RESPONSE: No one, including the FBI officials who reviewed the memo, has identified any factual errors, and the Committee encourages DOJ and FBI to make publicly available, to the greatest extent possible, documents in those agencies’ possession that would shed additional light on the abuses uncovered by the Committee. Also, the memo does not purport to be exhaustive: it is focused on DOJ and FBI’s use of the DNC- and Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier to obtain a warrant on an American citizen.
CHARGE: Most members have not reviewed the documents underlying the memo.
RESPONSE: As part of stonewalling the Committee’s investigation, senior officials at DOJ and FBI initially placed burdensome and unreasonable restrictions on the Committee’s access to documents responsive to its subpoenas. Chairman Nunes designated Chairman Gowdy, an experienced prosecutor and investigator, to lead the Committee’s review. All Republican members participated in weekly briefings on the results of the Committee’s investigative efforts, and the Committee does not believe there are—or should be—current restrictions on the Committee’s access to this important information.
CHARGE: The memo’s release violated an agreement with DOJ.
RESPONSE: DOJ and FBI placed no limits on disseminating the information made available to the Committee which—contrary to false claims—is not highly classified or limited to the so-called “Gang of 8.”
CHARGE: The Committee drafted the memo in coordination with the White House.
RESPONSE: This is patently false. No one outside the Committee played any role in drafting or compiling the memo. The Committee had no communications with the White House about the contents of the memo until after the Committee voted to make it publicly available, and it was transmitted to the President’s representatives in accordance with House rules.
CHARGE: The memo was materially altered after the Committee’s vote to make it public.
RESPONSE: The Committee’s vote to release the memo was procedurally sound, and in accordance with House and Committee Rules. The version transmitted to the White House included minor edits, made before the Committee voted to make the memo public, to the version previously made available to all members of the House. The minor edits included technical and grammatical changes, along with the deletion of one piece of information in response to FBI’s last-minute suggestion—which was in accordance with national security protocols, but had no bearing on the memo’s substance. The memo also includes a more precise characterization of the FISA application’s use of a Yahoo News article, in response to feedback from Committee Democrats. Complaints about these edits from Committee Democrats—none of whom voted to release any version of the memo—represent the latest example of the minority’s consistent efforts to obstruct the Committee’s efforts to collect and share information about FISA abuses. The minority opposed all efforts to obtain the underlying documents, including issuing subpoenas for them in August 2017.
CHARGE: The Committee blocked release of the Democrats’ memo.
RESPONSE: The Committee elected to follow the same process and timing for the Majority and Minority memos by first making each available for all members of the House to review. The Majority voted unanimously to make the Minority’s memo available to all House members, even though all Democrats voted against making the Majority’s memo similarly available. The Committee is planning a business meeting next week to address the Minority’s memo, and is soliciting feedback from Members of both parties who have reviewed it.
The original memo is available here and here. Key points are here, a charge and response is here, and a summary of FISA Title I is here.
That’s it? Dishonest and misleading memo wrecked the House intel committee, destroyed trust with Intelligence Community, damaged relationship with FISA court, and inexcusably exposed classified investigation of an American citizen. For what? DOJ & FBI must keep doing their jobs.
— James Comey (@Comey) February 2, 2018
What he doesn’t know is the strategy that is in play right now. Devin Nunes, Chuck Grassley, Bob Goodlatte, and Inspector General Michael Horowitz have coordinated efforts to get all of this information into the public.
Remember when Comey called Trump “Crazy” for suggesting he was being spied on? And now we learn the House Intelligence Committee Report shows that Comey signed off on the FISA application.
And we also know he leaked classified memos through his Columbia Law Professor “friend” Dan Richman to prompt a Special Counsel by his own words. WEASEL… Never Forget!
The real question: Was this really the first time the FBI and DOJ were weaponized to influence a US election?
We know the IRS was targeting the Tea Party during the previous election. There were studies conducted that show that the Tea Party would have swung the 2012 election to Mitt Romney had they not been targeted.
What if James Comey and the FBI are actually investigating the former Obama Administration?
We all know that FBI Director James Comey and NSA head Michael Rogers testified before the House Intelligence Committee on March 20. Given recent developments with Evelyn Farkas admissions and Susan Rice evidence – I invite you – NO I IMPLORE YOU – to read again the testimony from the FBI and NSA. I respectfully suggest that new insight can be gleaned from this testimony that indicates any investigation by the FBI regarding Trump and Russia is not necessarily directed at Trump or his Administration but is in fact directed at the former Obama Administration and the leaking of classified materials. This may explain why Trump hasn’t fired Comey yet. Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election[pdf-embedder url=”https://commonsenseevaluation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Full-transcript_-FBI-Director-James-Comey-testifies-on-Russian-interference-in-2016-election.pdf” title=”Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election”]
|
If Susan Rice did nothing wrong, and was just “doing her job” then why did she FLAT-OUT LIE and claim she “knew nothing” about the unmasking?
FLASHBACK: Susan Rice said ‘I know nothing about this. I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that account today’.
Susan Rice lies effortlessly. Now, we know for a fact, each time she blinks is a lie. Let’s face it… our whole political system could be compromised. How many Republicans have been surveilled (probably all of them, because we’re all surveilled now) and changed their votes because they’ve been compromised in this or other ways? Will we ever know? Why did Supreme Court Justice Roberts change his vote on ObamaCare at the last-minute with a nonsensical decision? What convinced him to change his vote and damage his reputation? Why did Republicans so often, so inexplicably, cave under Obama when it mattered most? Why do reformers, who are sent to Washington to – you know – reform, so often turn to swamp rats? Why do the conservative wolves always turn to wimps when it really matters? It can’t just be just about the money. Why does so much of what we’re told, and even the way these people talk on TV, look like C-grade kabuki theater or something out of the Soviet Kremlin? Why does so much of what these people say look like bad acting? Why were most political speeches so damn hollow before Trump came on the scene? Hmm… We don’t live in the free country we thought we lived in. Many of us just didn’t know it. We live in the Invasion of the Body Snatchers. More specifically, the Soul Snatchers. Fake News?! We’re a Fake Republic. Let’s face it. And just electing Trump doesn’t begin to restore what the Founders gave us (and we lost). We live in a world where the CIA is funding ISIS, pretending to be Russian hackers and actively working to take out an American President. And top Republicans support them! It seems like between the CIA, NSA, IRS, DOJ, the State Department, refugee policy, etc., etc. Obama, weaponized the entire American government against its own citizens and targeted political opponents. The former national security adviser — THE FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER — uses the national intelligence system to spy on political opponents. And the top Mainstream Media news agencies — CBS, CNN, ABC and NBC — just don’t think it’s worth reporting as front-page news. If Trump accomplishes nothing else, he deserves praise for exposing all of this!
|
