Hollywood Celebrities… It’s Time To Remove Their Stars

 Other  Comments Off on Hollywood Celebrities… It’s Time To Remove Their Stars
Nov 132017

The Left demands that we remove statues and symbols that offend them. When are we going to remove the sidewalk stars from the Hollywood Walk of Fame for all celebrities accused of sexual misconduct and pedophilia?

Hollywood Celebrities... It's Time To Remove Their Stars

Let’s start a movement everyone can to get behind. #RemoveTheirStar

Remember when a deranged Liberal used a sledgehammer and a pickaxe to destroy Donald Trump’s star on Hollywood’s Walk of Fame?





Why So Many American Catholics Loathe Pope Francis

 Other  Comments Off on Why So Many American Catholics Loathe Pope Francis
Jul 262017

Asking “Is the Pope Catholic?” no longer seems to be a merely rhetorical question for many.

Why So Many American Catholics Loathe Pope Francis

Around the world, Pope Francis is understandably rather popular. It’s not just that he’s a good pastor; it’s that he doesn’t hesitate to speak truth to power when he can have an effect.

But he’s probably less popular among US Catholics than anywhere else in the Church. The reasons for that are instructive, and not only for Catholics.
Tom Hoopes, writer in residence at Benedictine College, Kansas, recently published a book of reflections on the message of Pope Francis: What Pope Francis Really Said: Words of Comfort and Challenge. Having followed Hoopes’ writing for a number of years, I respect his opinions even when I disagree with him.

So a few days ago, I lapped up a promotional interview for his book: Why Aren’t Catholics Rallying Around the Pope?. It’s for a conservative Australian publication, and it’s a pleasure to hear him explain conservative American Catholics to conservative Australian Catholics!

One complaint common among Americans is that Francis represents a break with Pope Benedict. That isn’t really true, of course. Hoopes says it’s

“…a difference in style, not substance, in Francis from his predecessors. None of them can be classified as “conservative” or “liberal.” They all have “liberal” views on economics, the environment and immigration and “conservative” views on sexual ethics, the role of religion and “old fashioned” Catholic truths such as the Devil, Mary and Confession.

One stylistic difference is Francis’s harsh attitude toward economic sinners and his red-hot contempt for the Western “myths” he calls out: individualism, consumerism, and blind faith in technology.

That “stylistic difference,” however, sets many conservative American Catholics’ teeth on edge. Most such Catholics are Republicans, originally because of the abortion issue. To be Republican by conviction is, of course, to support “free-market” capitalism, including constant technological innovation and limited government, which usually translates into wanting less labor and environmental regulation as well as reined-in social spending. Given the wave of populism that brought Donald Trump into the White House, it now also means increasing restrictions on immigration and harsher penalties for illegal immigrants.

So it’s largely Francis’ politics that conservative American Catholics dislike. My friend David Mills, another Catholic journalist and editor, notes that they especially resent the Pope’s “…criticism of the kind of totalizing and optimistic kind of free market economics conservative American Catholics embrace…I don’t think you can exaggerate how devoted to their politics many Catholics are, to the point that it drives their religion. This has long been a conservative Catholic critique of liberal Catholics, and not unfairly, but it applies to the right as much as to the left.”

But conservative American Catholics also dislike Francis’ welcoming approach to the divorced-and-remarried. Though I’m all-too-familiar with the intricacies of the dispute, I can’t get into them here. Suffice it to say that many think he’s abandoning the Church’s traditional teaching about the indissolubility of marriage: not by denying it—he actually affirms it, in theory—but by making its pastoral application so flexible as to render it irrelevant. In the conservative Catholic mind, there could hardly be any greater papal sin than that.

The net effect of all these resentments is to make a large swath of theologically educated and influential American Catholics very angry with Pope Francis. Asking “Is the Pope Catholic?” no longer seems to be a merely rhetorical question for many. That is not edifying, but neither is it unprecedented.

This is an interesting time for the Church.

This post Why So Many American Catholics Loathe Pope Francis was originally published on Intellectual Takeout by Michael Liccione.


200-Year-Old Letter Predicts WW3 And Final Battle Against Islam

 Other  Comments Off on 200-Year-Old Letter Predicts WW3 And Final Battle Against Islam
Jun 132017

A LETTER written more than 200 years ago by a top military chief chillingly predicted the two world wars – before warning of a final “bloody” battle with Islam.

200-Year-Old Letter Predicts WW3 And Final Battle Against Islam

Albert Pike, who was a captain for the US army during the American Civil War, is said to have written a doctrine to an Italian politician outlining plans for the trio global conflicts.

The letter plots how and why the first and second world wars broke out in the 1900s and provides an even more chilling prophecy over a third and final battle.

The document allegedly suggested World War One was planned to overthrow the Tsars in Russia and make the country a communist stronghold.

The Second World War was sparked as a catalyst to destroy Nazism, according to the letter, so communism could take over wearier governments and for a sovereign state of Israel to be set up in Palestine.

A third world war, according to Mr Pike, will be fought against the West and leaders of the Islamic war.

Mr Pike warned the third war would be “the most bloody turmoil”.

The document features heavily in the book Satan, Prince of this World, by former naval officer William Guy Carr.

200-Year-Old Letter Predicts WW3 And Final Battle Against Islam

Mr Pike is said to have written, according to Mr Carr’s book: “The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Tsars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism.”

It was reportedly sent by Pike, a Freemason, to Italian politician Giuseppe Mazzini and was dated August 15, 1871.

The letter allegedly said: “The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the ‘agentur’ of the ‘Illuminati’ between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World.

“The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Muslim Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.

“Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion.


The Hollow Earth: The Greatest Geographical Discovery In History Made By Admiral Richard E. Byrd

 Other  Comments Off on The Hollow Earth: The Greatest Geographical Discovery In History Made By Admiral Richard E. Byrd
Feb 162017
The Hollow Earth: The Greatest Geographical Discovery in History Made by Admiral Richard E. Byrd in the Mysterious Land Beyond the Poles – The True Origin of the Flying Saucers

The Hollow Earth: The Greatest Geographical Discovery In History Made By Admiral Richard E. Byrd

Widely read and reprinted many times, Raymond Bernard’s book is considered by many to be the definitive treatise on the “Hollow Earth” theory. The book purports that the Earth has a hollow and habitable interior, with a small sun in place of a molten core, and is inhabited by a race of “Superhumans” who are the descendants of the exiled residents of the long lost continents of Atlantis and Lemuria. Bernard claimed that the true North and South poles had not yet been discovered, and that in their place are concave openings to the inner Earth.

Bernard quotes several diary entries and radio announcements by polar explorer Admiral Richard E. Byrd as being definitive proof for his theory that travel to the Earth’s interior was possible. Bernard claims that Byrd’s 1947 and 1956 expeditions took him “beyond the poles” into to a land of lush, green vegetation.

Bernard also popularized the theory that Atlantean inner-Earth beings invented flying saucers (or “vimanas”) many years ago, and were now visiting our realm.

From the original back cover copy for the book: Revealed! The Underground World of Supermen Discovered Under the North Pole!

Can you explain the following?

Why does one find tropical seeds, plants and trees floating in the fresh water of icebergs?
Why do millions of tropical birds and animals go farther north in the wintertime?
If it is not hollow and warm inside the Earth at the Poles, then why does colored pollen color the Earth for thousands of miles?
Why is it warmer at the Poles than 600 to 1000 miles away from them?
Why does the north wind in the Arctic get warmer as one sails north beyond 70° latitude?

On top of it all, Admiral Byrd is supposed to have made several journeys inside the earth by traveling through the holes in the poles.

Could there be anything to Bernard s bizarre claims?

The Hollow Earth: The Greatest Geographical Discovery In History Made By Admiral Richard E. Byrd

For your reading enjoyment!


To the Future Explorers of the New World that exists beyond North and South Poles in the hollow interior of the Earth. Who will Repeat Admiral Byrd’s historic Flight for 1,700 Miles beyond the North Pole and that of his Expedition for 2,300 Miles beyond the South Pole, entering a New Unknown Territory not shown on any map, covering an immense land area whose total size is larger than North America, consisting of forests, mountains, lakes, vegetation and animal life.

The aviator who will be the first to reach this New Territory, unknown until Admiral Byrd first discovered it, will go down in history as a New Columbus and greater than Columbus, for while Columbus discovered a new continent, he will discover a New World.


Dr. R. W. Bernard, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.


210 Fifth Avenue, New York 10, N.Y.

Note: Author is deceased and publishing company defunct. Rights are not reserved.

The Hollow Earth

The Hollow Earth: The Bizarre 60s Classic


Jan 142017
Head of D.C. National Guard to be removed from post in middle of inauguration

Head Of DC National Guard Removed From Command During Inauguration

What are they planning?

The Army general who heads the D.C. National Guard and has an integral part in overseeing the inauguration will be removed from command effective at 12:01 p.m. Jan. 20, just as Donald Trump is sworn in as president.

The head of the District of Columbia National Guard has been ordered to step down immediately after President-elect Donald Trump takes office.

Maj. Gen. Errol Schwartz will be stepping down at 12:01 p.m. on Jan. 20, just after Trump is sworn in, Maj. Byron Coward, a guard spokesman said.

Schwartz, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, told The Washington Post in an interview “the timing is very unusual” but that he’s following orders.

Unlike the commanders of state-level National Guard units, the head of the District’s National Guard serves at the pleasure of the president. At the time Schwartz departs, he will be in the midst of commanding thousands of Guard troops from the District and around the country who are providing support for the inauguration.

“My troops will be on the street,” he said in an interview, according to the paper. “I’ll see them off, but I won’t be able to welcome them back to the armory.” He went on to say that he would “never plan to leave a mission in the middle of a battle.”

Phil Mendelson, the D.C. Council chairman, criticized the move.

“It doesn’t make sense to can the general in the middle of an active deployment,” Mendelson told The Post. He added that Schwartz’s sudden departure will be a long-term loss for the District. “He’s been really very good at working with the community, and my impression was that he was good for the Guard.”

The Post reported that there have been contradictory stories about the behind-the-scenes developments leading to the decision. A person close to the Trump transition team reportedly said transition officials wanted to keep him, but the Army pushed for a replacement. Schwartz reportedly said the orders came in an email from the Pentagon. He will be replaced by a brigadier general at 12:01 p.m.


This is highly unusual!

Maj. Gen. Errol R. Schwartz may be a good guy who will properly respond to insurrection and shut down a criminal anti Trump DC riot by paid Soros/Clinton agitators.

His replacement may let it grow to a disaster.

From Gateway Pundit:

FAKE NEWS: WaPo Did Not Tell Whole Story on DC National Guard Chief’s Resignation

Now This…
The Trump administration told FOX News of Friday the story is a crock.

Schwartz was offered to stay on his post until after the Inauguration but decided to quit during the ceremony and then he ran to the press to complain.

According to FOX,

“The Trump Transition team reportedly offered to let him keep his job until the ceremonies were over. Maj. Gen Schwartz refused. It appears he would rather argue his would rather argue his case though in the press.”



Who’s Behind These Spontaneous Protests?

 Other  Comments Off on Who’s Behind These Spontaneous Protests?
Nov 112016

George Soros, Hillary Clinton, The DNC And Barack Hussein Obama are behind these “spontaneous” protests.

Think about it. Hillary couldn’t even gin up enough enthusiasm at her rallies to draw even 200 hundred people. Now thousands of violent thugs are taking to the streets because she lost?

It doesn’t add up!

Why aren’t Obama and Hillary condemning these protests? Where were these protesters when Hillary and the DNC stole the Primary from Bernie Sanders?

This reeks of Saul Alinsky!

George Soros Is The Main Instigator Funding All These Trump Protests

Oct 202016

Add another name to the Clinton body count.

The Clinton’s seem to have very little regard for human life and their past has shown that they will stop at nothing to get what they want. All of the countless bodies dropping like flies around them at very ‘convenient’ times has to be more than a coincidence.

It has been reported that Hillary Clinton’s doctor, Sandeep Sherlekar, has “died.” Dr. Sherlekar was responsible for treating Hillary Clinton’s brain injury in December of 2012.


It was ruled that Dr. Sherlekar committed suicide because he was in legal trouble. That is the story the media wants you to believe, but that is a complete lie. There is a clear pattern of foul play leading up to his death, and it should be exposed to the people.

As stated, Dr. Sherlekar treated Hillary Clinton in 2012 when she collapsed, smashed her head on the side of a table, and suffered a concussion. While treating her, it was also determined that Hillary had a brain clot on her brain, as well.

This information is crucial because in 2012, Hillary was eyeing an election run in 2016, and if rumors about her heath and brain injuries were revealed to the public, it would damage her chances of winning the election.

Dr. Sherlekar was devout follower of the Hindu religion. As his patients and coworkers indicated, he was calm, happy, and very much in love with life. It makes no sense for this man to go from being extremely happy and in love with life to killing himself. We are missing something in this story, and the missing clue revolves around the Clintons.

Reports indicate that Hillary’s doctor was an informant between 2012 and 2014. Agents were working to entrap Chief Financial Officer, Vic Wadhwa, of American Spine Center for accepting bribes. At the time, Dr. Sherlekar was also working at the center and knew that Wadhwa received around $459,000 in kickbacks.

Following this investigation, agents turned around and accused Dr. Sherlekar of the same crimes. When Dr. Sherlekar threatened to expose Hillary’s health records, things got bad for him very quickly.

Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State at this time, so she had the perfect opportunity to “get rid of” the man threatening to expose her health records to the public.

Isn’t it very odd that people with information surrounding the Clintons either go missing or mysteriously die? Eventually, we have to realize that all of these deaths are not just coincidental.

What about the recent case of DNC staffer Seth Rich? Rich was rumored, and was almost confirmed by Julian Assange, to have been the source that provided WikiLeaks with all of the information surrounding the DNC and how they rigged the primaries against Bernie Sanders and for Hillary Clinton.

Seth Rich was shot in the back of the head late one evening while walking home. Police ruled it a “robbery,” yet Rich’s family reported that absolutely nothing was missing and that he was not robbed.

Sadly, it is uncertain if we will ever know the truth surrounding this “kill list,” but we know that anyone that gets in the Clintons way becomes an enemy.

One day, she will pay for all of the crimes she has committed. Hopefully, that day is coming soon when President Trump appoints a special prosecutor to formally charge her and put her in prison.


Hillary Clinton Doctor Dead


Just One More Thing On Russia Manipulating Our Election

 Other  Comments Off on Just One More Thing On Russia Manipulating Our Election
Oct 152016
Just one more thing on Russia manipulating our election.

The DNC is mad at Russia because they ‘think’ they are trying to manipulate our election by exposing that the DNC is manipulating our election?




Can’t Do It… Michelle Obama Hates Hillary

 Other  Comments Off on Can’t Do It… Michelle Obama Hates Hillary
Oct 152016

Barack Hussein Obama and Michelle Obama have been running around pretending Hillary Clinton is the most qualified person ever to run for President.

But, like Trump mentioned in the debate, that’s a far cry from what Michelle Obama said about her in 2008.

In fact, they were pretty nasty to the “Wicked Witch Of The West” back in 2008.

Hope and Change my ass!

A new book called First Women: The Grace and Power of America’s Modern First Ladies by New York Times bestselling author Kate Anderson Brower reveals that Michelle Obama hates former First Lady Hillary Clinton and that Mrs. Obama is largely unhappy with her position as First Lady.

Michelle has apparently refused to invite Hillary and former President Bill Clinton over to the White House for dinner due to built up animosity over the 2008 primary election between then-Senator Obama and Hillary.

“Michelle’s feelings towards Hillary were blatantly obvious when no couple dinners were scheduled at the Obama White House while Hillary was secretary of state and frequently meeting with the President,” reports The Daily Mail UK.

Brower’s book says that relationships between First Ladies can often be warm and sorority-like, while some are rivalistic, “fraught with hurt feelings and resentment, like that between Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama.”

“The 2008 presidential campaign left deep and lasting scars on both the Clinton and the Obama camps, and they are still shockingly fresh,” writes Brower. Apparently, Michelle is still miffed that Hillary dared mock her husband’s (failed) message of “Hope and Change.”

For example, at a 2008 campaign rally in Ohio, Hillary ridiculed Obama: “The sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be singing, and everyone will know that we should do the right thing, and the world would be perfect.”

The First Lady is no fan of Bill either: “When Michelle Obama views the Clintons, I don’t want to say she’s looking down her nose at them – but she kind of is,” a former Obama advisor told Brower.

The Clinton inner-circle seemingly feels the same underwhelming sentiment for Michelle, specifically as a First Lady: “Those Clinton acolytes also suggest that ‘Michelle has not done enough as first lady’ and has failed to prioritize funding for some programs that subsequently lost their federal support,” notes The Daily Mail UK.

One of the programs not taken up by Michelle was “Save America’s Treasures, a program that Hillary started to help preserve and protect historic sites, arts and published works and was lovingly carried on by Laura Bush, the next first lady.”

Mrs. Obama “felt no such obligation to those treasures and let the program dissolve.”

Michelle is reportedly unhappy as First Lady, too, once telling Late Show host Steven Colbert that she looked forward to the day she could escape “the watchful eye of the Secret Service.”

“Over the past seven years, Michelle’s unhappiness is evident in the increasingly difficult access to her as first lady,” says The Daily Mail UK. “Friends of the first lady say that Michelle’s unhappiness as first lady is the reason for that hard line.”

“Requests to the first lady’s East Wing office for an interview are normally politely declined,” said CBS News’ Bill Plant.

Further, Mrs. Obama shut down the idea of becoming too politically involved, explaining that being submersed in policy would bore her.

“The notion of sitting around the table with a set of policy advisers – no offense – makes me yawn,” she said.

The First Lady has instead become deeply passionate about fashion and famously campaigns for the “Let’s Move” initiative intended to end childhood obesity by monitoring youngsters’ food choices.

Evidence of a cold, even hateful relationship between Michelle and Hillary comes as no surprise. The former secretary of state and President Obama have had a suspect relationship for years, only becoming warmer publicly in recent months as Hillary is under federal investigation and running for president, and Mr. Obama is doing everything in his power to buildup and strengthen his legacy.